Article: Foreclosure Aid Rising Locally, as is Dissent
Thursday, February 28th, 2008I’ve been thinking about an article in the NYTimes: Foreclosure Aid Rising Locally, as Is Dissent. This is sort of where I was a couple months ago. I have a house, with an adjustable rate mortgage, purchased a few years ago. But because I bought a house that I could afford, I’m not going get any help with the mortgage. And my feeling was that bailouts were a huge misuse of people’s money, time and effort.
“Just can’t agree with using taxpayer dollars to bail out private homeowners, no matter how the mayor tries to justify it,” read a complaint posted on the “Soundoff” section of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s Web site.
But after a few months of thinking about it (not solid thinking of course, just occasionally having it pop into my mind) I realized that if the slightly crazy neighbor next to me went into foreclosure and his house were auctioned off, that would be the most recent comp (comparable sale) when I went to sell my house. And the auction price for a house that hasn’t been spruced up is not that great, especially here in the winter. So if he goes into foreclosure, the value of my house (and thus my bottom line) sinks.
The goal of these programs is not just to keep people from losing their homes, but also to limit broader economic fallout, including plummeting property tax revenues and widespread declines in home values. Still, they pit what some government officials say are practical economic solutions for the common good against individual ideals of fairness and personal responsibility.
So while I hate the idea of bailing out idiots and liars, it still might be in my best interest.